Lee v. MVW of Nevada, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michaela Lee
Defendant: MVW of Nevada, Inc. d/b/a Marriott's Grand Chateau and MVW of Nevada, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv01724
Filed: October 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Richard F Boulware
Referring Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER that the Court issues this order to advise the parties that discovery motions filed in this case will not be briefed according to the default schedule outlined in Local Rule 7-2(b), but will instead be briefed on shortened deadlines absent leave from the Court, see Local Rule IA 1-4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
November 15, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (SLD)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER Granting #10 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 6/30/2020. Motions due by 7/30/2020. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
November 14, 2019 Filing 10 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Michaela Lee. (Simon, Daniel)
November 4, 2019 Filing 9 Interim STATUS REPORT by Defendant MVW of Nevada, Inc.. (Hoyt, Kyle)
October 21, 2019 Filing 8 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant MVW of Nevada, Inc.. (Hoyt, Kyle)
October 17, 2019 Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant MVW of Nevada, Inc.. (Hoyt, Kyle)
October 7, 2019 Filing 6 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
October 4, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Michaela Lee. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Simon, Daniel)
October 4, 2019 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/4/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/19/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
October 4, 2019 Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JM)
October 3, 2019 Filing 3 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by MVW of Nevada, Inc. d/b/a Marriott's Grand Chateau. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/17/2019.(Hoyt, Kyle) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
October 3, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by MVW of Nevada, Inc. d/b/a Marriott's Grand Chateau. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Hoyt, Kyle)
October 3, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Clark County District Court, Case Number A-19-800388-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5726062) by MVW of Nevada, Inc. d/b/a Marriott's Grand Chateau. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hoyt, Kyle) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. MVW of Nevada, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michaela Lee
Represented By: Daniel S Simon
Represented By: Benjamin J Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MVW of Nevada, Inc. d/b/a Marriott's Grand Chateau
Represented By: Kyle Joseph Hoyt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MVW of Nevada, Inc.
Represented By: Kyle Joseph Hoyt
Represented By: Analise N. M. Tilton
Represented By: Janice M Michaels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?