Alexander v. Teamsters Local 986 et al
Plaintiff: Kurt Alexander
Defendant: Teamsters Local 986 and LV Newco, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv01759
Filed: October 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Daniel J Albregts
Referring Judge: Richard F Boulware
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Teamsters Local 986. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Levy, Lewis)
October 9, 2019 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint filed by LV Newco, LLC. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 11/23/2019.(Pierce, Shannon) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
October 9, 2019 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
October 9, 2019 Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/9/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/24/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
October 9, 2019 Filing 1 Joint PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial district Court of the State Of Nevada, Case Number A-19-796313-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5732813) by Teamsters Local 986, LV Newco, LLC dba The Linq Hotel and Casino. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal)(Levy, Lewis) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
October 9, 2019 Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (JM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander v. Teamsters Local 986 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kurt Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teamsters Local 986
Represented By: Lewis N. Levy
Represented By: Daniel R Barth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LV Newco, LLC
Represented By: Shannon S. Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?