Scott v. Tebha et al
Breckon J Scott |
Cloud 9 LV dba Evapor8, AMV Holdings, LLC, Ahmed Tebha, Madvapes Franchising, LLC and Cloud 9 LV, LLC |
2:2019cv01919 |
October 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Andrew P Gordon |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 REPLY to Response to #8 Motion to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Breckon J Scott. (Kane, Michael) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE of violation of Local Rules. ECF No. #10 was not filed pursuant to LR IA 10-3(d). An index of exhibits was not provided.Attorney Kevin Smith is advised in the future to file documents pursuant to the Local Rules. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. DO NOT refile. (no image attached) (MMM) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #8 Motion to Remand to State Court by Defendants Cloud 9 LV, LLC, Ahmed Tebha. Replies due by 12/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G) (Smith, Kevin) |
Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE to #7 Order by Defendants Cloud 9 LV, LLC, Ahmed Tebha. (Smith, Kevin) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court re #7 Order by Plaintiff Breckon J Scott. Responses due by 12/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Kane, Michael) |
Filing 7 ORDER re #6 Response. Motion to Remand due by 12/2/2019. Supplemental Brief due by 12/5/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to #5 Order to Show Cause, by Defendants Cloud 9 LV, LLC, Ahmed Tebha. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Smith, Kevin) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Defendants Ahmed Tebha and Cloud 9 LV, LLC shall show cause in writing why this action should not be remanded to state court by 11/29/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Cloud 9 LV, LLC, Ahmed Tebha. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Jaffe, Steven) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/31/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 11/15/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Case Number A-18-779830-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5758424) by Ahmed Tebha, Cloud 9 LV dba Evapor8. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Jaffe, Steven) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.