Manipon v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Vivian E. Manipon |
Equifax Information Services, LLC and American Honda Finance Corp |
2:2019cv01946 |
November 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Daniel J Albregts |
Richard F Boulware |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/19/2019. In light of the filing of #12 Notice of Settlement, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file settlement documents, stipulation for dismissal or joint status report within 60 days. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CVL) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement with Equifax by Vivian E. Manipon. (Krieger, David) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by American Honda Finance Corp. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/24/2020.(Butterfield, Chad) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Extend Time; American Honda Finance Corp answer due 12/10/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 12/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time; Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 12/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 12/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Docket Correction to ECF No. #5 : event changed from Stipulation to Joint Motion by Court. Document signed by fewer than all parties or their attorneys. Do NOT refile. (no image attached) (MMM) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by American Honda Finance Corp. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Butterfield, Chad) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant American Honda Finance Corp. (Butterfield, Chad) |
Filing 5
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (ADR) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Vivian E. Manipon. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5765777) by Vivian E. Manipon. Proof of service due by 2/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Equifax, #3 Summons Honda)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.