McMillan v. Skyline Security Management, Inc
Michael P. McMillan |
Juliana S McMillan |
Skyline Security Management, Inc |
2:2019cv01995 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Gloria M Navarro |
Brenda Weksler |
Consumer Credit |
47 U.S.C. § 227 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER Granting #15 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Keith Wesley for Skyline Security Management, Inc and approving Designation of Local Counsel Charles H McCrea. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/13/2020. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 16 ORDER Granting #14 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Lori S Brody for Skyline Security Management, Inc and approving Designation of Local Counsel Charles H. McCrea. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/13/2020. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 15 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Keith Joseph Wesley and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Charles H. McCrea (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-5843034) by ThirdParty Plaintiff Skyline Security Management, Inc, Defendant Skyline Security Management, Inc. (McCrea, Charles) |
Filing 14 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Lori Sambol Brody and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Charles H. McCrea (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-5843026) by ThirdParty Plaintiff Skyline Security Management, Inc, Defendant Skyline Security Management, Inc. (McCrea, Charles) |
Filing 13 Summons Issued as to Juliana S McMillan re #10 Third Party Complaint. (MMM) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Keith J. Wesley and Lori Sambol Brody to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. For your convenience, click on the following link to obtain the form from the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Upon approval of the Verified Petition, counsel is required to register for the Court's Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system and the electronic service of documents. Please visit the Court's website www.nvd.uscourts.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 2/24/2020. (no image attached) (MMM) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or, Alternatively Stay the Action by Defendant Skyline Security Management, Inc. Responses due by 1/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration) (McCrea, Charles) Modified event on 1/10/2020 (MMM). |
Filing 10 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Juliana S McMillan by Skyline Security Management, Inc. Adds new parties. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (McCrea, Charles) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Skyline Security Management, Inc. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/22/2020.(McCrea, Charles) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 8 ORDER Granting #6 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). Skyline Security Management, Inc answer due 1/8/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 12/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Skyline Security Management, Inc. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (McCrea, Charles) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Skyline Security Management, Inc. (McCrea, Charles) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Association of Counsel by Miles N Clark on behalf of Plaintiff Michael P. McMillan. (Clark, Miles) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Skyline Security Management, Inc. (JM) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Michael P. McMillan. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5778912) by Michael P. McMillan. Proof of service due by 2/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Skyline)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.