Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Manual Gonzalez-Rodriguez |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 2:2019cv02022 |
| November 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| James C Mahan |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (JM) |
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER granting #9 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order; Discovery due by 5/29/2020. Motions due by 6/29/2020. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/29/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
| Filing 9 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Manual Gonzalez-Rodriguez. (Miller, Danielle) |
| Filing 8 STATUS REPORT by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (McGaha, Pamela) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (McGaha, Pamela) |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (McGaha, Pamela) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER re #1 Petition for Removal,, filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/16/2020.(McGaha, Pamela) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Manual Gonzalez-Rodriguez. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Miller, Danielle) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 11/21/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/6/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 12/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Freeman, Robert) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-19-803920-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5786452) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Freeman, Robert) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
