Haviland v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc et al
| Elizabeth M. Haviland |
| KeyBank, NA and Dyck-O'Neal, Inc |
| 2:2019cv02060 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Stipulation; KeyBank, NA answer due 2/4/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 1/21/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant KeyBank, NA. (Dove, Kelly) |
| Filing 9 ERROR NOTICE to counsel re filing of #8 Certificate of Interested Parties,. All interested parties were not properly entered on the docket. Attorney Kelly H. Dove advised that in the future, Certificates of Interested Parties filed with the District of Nevada shall be filed in accordance with FRCP 7.1 and LR 7.1-1, and shall enter on the docket all persons, associations of person, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by KeyBank, NA. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case Corporate Parent KeyCorp added (Dove, Kelly) Modified on 1/6/2020 to add corporate parent(DKJ). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Granting #6 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). KeyBank, NA answer due 1/21/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 12/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant KeyBank, NA. (Dove, Kelly) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, with Jury Demand filed by Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/6/2020.(Waite, Trevor) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (ADR) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Elizabeth M. Haviland. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5795672) by Elizabeth M. Haviland. Proof of service due by 3/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Dyck, #3 Summons KeyBank)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
