Ramirez v. Williams et al
| Jose Ramirez |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Warden Brian Williams and Brian Williams |
| 2:2019cv02073 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #2 Advisory Letter Habeas only - FORM addressed to Jose Ramirez. Envelope marked "Return to Sender"; clerk updated prisoner ID to 1006222 and re-mailed ecf no. 2. (ADR) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Order to Show Cause addressed to Jose Ramirez. Envelope marked "Return to Sender- Refused"; clerk did not re-mail. (ADR) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 1/15/2020. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Williams, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:19-cv-02073-JAD-EJY. (ADR) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner Jose Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel)(ADR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
