Randolph v. Kopperud
Plaintiff: Melanie Randolph
Defendant: Mary Kopperud
Case Number: 2:2019cv02150
Filed: December 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Richard F Boulware
Referring Judge: Brenda Weksler
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2020 Filing 8 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant Mary Kopperud. (Zarcone, Justin)
January 23, 2020 Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Mary Kopperud. (Zarcone, Justin)
December 17, 2019 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 5-1(b). ECF No. #5 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 5-1(b). Please note the signatory must be the attorney or pro se party who electronically files the document. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. (no image attached) (DKJ)
December 17, 2019 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Mary Kopperud. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Zarcone, Justin)
December 16, 2019 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Attorney's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #1 . Attorney Inku Nam is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (DKJ)
December 16, 2019 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
December 16, 2019 Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/16/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 12/31/2019. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 1/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
December 16, 2019 Filing 1 First PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-19-797291-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5812691) by Mary Kopperud. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zarcone, Justin) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
December 16, 2019 Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (ADR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Randolph v. Kopperud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melanie Randolph
Represented By: R. Todd Terry
Represented By: Peter S. Christiansen
Represented By: Whitney Barrett
Represented By: Matthew E. Aaron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Kopperud
Represented By: Inku Nam
Represented By: Justin Zarcone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?