Greene v. The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Marshall Greene |
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
2:2019cv02165 |
December 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Nancy J Koppe |
Gloria M Navarro |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT this action is dismissed without prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 1/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 4 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as set forth in this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/14/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL Petition re #1 -1 Petition, by Petitioner Marshall Greene. (See, Case No. 2:19-cv-02184-GMN-NJK - MR) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Attorney General of the State of Nevada has been received and assigned case number 2:19-cv-02165-GMN-NJK. (MR) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.