Greene v. Howell et al
Marshall Greene |
Jerry Howell and Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
2:2019cv02184 |
December 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Nancy J Koppe |
Gloria M Navarro |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court take #1 -1 the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and file it as a supplemental petition in Greene v. Attorney General, Case No. 2:19-cv-02165-GMN-NJK. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that that the clerk shall add Aaron Ford, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court administratively close this action. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/9/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Jerry Howell, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:19-cv-02184-GMN-NJK. (SLD) |
Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) (SLD) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.