Burns v. Equifax, Inc
Plaintiff: Randall Burns
Defendant: Equifax, Inc
Case Number: 2:2019cv02203
Filed: December 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Referring Judge: Gloria M Navarro
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2020 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL RETURN. Transferred case opened in Northern District of Georgia as case 1:20-cv-00076 on 1/7/2020. (ADR)
January 7, 2020 Filing 8 MDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-59) transferring case to the Northern District of Georgia. Signed by MDL on 1/7/2020. (Attachments: #1 MDL Minute Order) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
January 7, 2020 Filing 7 TRANSMITTAL of case to the Northern District of Georgia. Case and docket sheet transferred electronically. (no image attached) (ADR)
January 7, 2020 Filing 6 Certified Conditional Transfer Order # 59. Signed by MDL Panel on 01/07/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
December 26, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Case by Defendant Equifax, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Notice, #2 Exhibit B Transfer, #3 Proposed Order) (Thompson, Jeremy)
December 23, 2019 Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
December 23, 2019 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/23/2019. Statement regarding removed action is due by 1/7/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 1/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
December 20, 2019 Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (ADR)
December 20, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Equifax, Inc. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Thompson, Jeremy)
December 20, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-19-805043-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5820710) by Equifax, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Thompson, Jeremy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burns v. Equifax, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randall Burns
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Represented By: Miles N Clark
Represented By: Matthew I Knepper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax, Inc
Represented By: Jeremy J. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?