Watt v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Dianna L. Watt |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, First Premier Bank and Factor Trust, Inc |
| 2:2019cv02229 |
| December 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER Granting #10 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: #1 Complaint. First Premier Bank answer due 3/27/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER Granting #9 Motion to Extend Time Re: #1 Complaint. Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 3/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by First Premier Bank that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliate United National Corp. for First Premier Bank added. (Rubin, Stacy) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant First Premier Bank. (Rubin, Stacy) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (Second Request) For Defendant, Equifax Information Services to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #5 First Joint Motion to Extend Time Re: #1 Complaint. Equifax Information Services, LLC's answer due 2/20/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Granting #6 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: #1 Complaint. First Premier Bank's answer due 2/26/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant First Premier Bank. (Rubin, Stacy) |
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Thompson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (SLD) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Dianna L. Watt. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5826295) by Dianna L. Watt. Proof of service due by 3/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Equfiax, #3 Summons Factor Trust, #4 Summons First Premier)(Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
