Ward v. The Vons Companies, Inc. et al
| Sally Ward |
| The Vons Companies, Inc. and Gatekeeper Systems Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00251 |
| February 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| James C Mahan |
| Brenda Weksler |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that #6 plaintiff's motion to remand be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter of Ward v. The Vons Companies, Inc. et al., case number 2:20-cv-00251- JCM-BNW, be, and the same hereby is, REMANDED to the Eighth Judicial District Court. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/16/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: Certified Copy of Order and Docket Sheet Sent to State Court - JQC)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (JQC) |
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER Granting #15 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 10/31/2020. Motions due by 11/30/2020. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/30/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/10/2020.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 16 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendant The Vons Companies, Inc.. (Smerber, Justin) |
| Filing 15 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant The Vons Companies, Inc.. (Smerber, Justin) |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #13 . Document is not in compliance with LR IA 10-2 as the case number is deficient. Counsel is advised to correct the case number to 2:20-cv-00251-JCM-BNW for all future filings. No further action is required to document #13 at this time. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to #6 Motion to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Sally Ward. (Price, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 JOINDER to #11 Response by Defendant Gatekeeper Systems Inc.. (Higgins, Jennifer) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to #6 Motion to Remand to State Court by Defendant The Vons Companies, Inc.. Replies due by 3/4/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Declaration) (Brandon, Lewis) |
| Filing 10 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant The Vons Companies, Inc.. (Brandon, Lewis) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Sally Ward. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Price, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Attorney's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #7 . Attorney Sara Pasquale is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
| Filing 7 The Vons Companies, Inc.'s ANSWER with Jury Demand re #1 Petition for Removal, filed by The Vons Companies, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 3/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Demand for Jury Trial)(Brandon, Lewis) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Sally Ward. Responses due by 2/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Process Server) (Price, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #3 Certificate of Interested Parties by Defendant The Vons Companies, Inc.. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Brandon, Lewis) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #3 . Document is not in compliance with LR IA 10-2 as it does not contain the case number of 2:20-cv-00251-JCM-BNW. Counsel is advised to correct the deficiency and file a Notice of Corrected Image/Document and link to #3 . (no image attached) (DKJ) |
| Filing 3 VIEW #5 corrected image re CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by The Vons Companies, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Brandon, Lewis) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 2/5/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 2/20/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 3/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Clark County District Court, State of Nevada, Case Number A-19-797118-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5875540) by The Vons Companies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Brandon, Lewis) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
