JoshCo Tech, LLC v. Max VA Benefits Consulting Services, Inc. et al
JoshCo Tech, LLC |
Max VA Benefits Consulting Services, Inc. and Jose Briceno |
2:2020cv00450 |
March 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Elayna J Youchah |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 RESPONSE to #13 Motion to Dismiss,,, by Plaintiff JoshCo Tech, LLC. Replies due by 5/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Zhong, Meng) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Richard R. Rice to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. For your convenience, click on the following link to obtain the form from the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Upon approval of the Verified Petition, counsel is required to register for the Court's Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system and the electronic service of documents. Please visit the Court's website www.nvd.uscourts.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 6/1/2020. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, by Defendants Jose Briceno, Max VA Benefits Consulting Services, Inc.. Responses due by 5/1/2020. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 6/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Affiliate Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2-Complaint in the San Diego Briceno case, #3 Exhibit 3-Complaint in the San Diego Moorehouse case, #4 Exhibit 4-Fourth Amended Complaint in the San Diego Lujan case, #5 Exhibit 5-Copies of all pages of the MAX VA website, #6 Exhibit 6-Nevada Secretary of State entity information for JoshCo Tech, LLC) (Dove, Kelly) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting #11 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jeffrey A. Feasby for JoshCo Tech, LLC and approving Designation of Local Counsel Meng Zhong. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/13/2020. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 11 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey Alan Feasby and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Meng Zhong (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-5962659) by Plaintiff JoshCo Tech, LLC. (Zhong, Meng) |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting #9 Motion to Extend Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). Defendants answer due 4/10/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff JoshCo Tech, LLC. (Zhong, Meng) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JoshCo Tech, LLC re #5 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #2 Certificate of Interested Parties, 6 Standing Order, #3 AO 121 Copyright Report. Max VA Benefits Consulting Services, Inc. served on 3/12/2020. (Zhong, Meng) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JoshCo Tech, LLC re #5 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #2 Certificate of Interested Parties, 6 Standing Order, #3 AO 121 Copyright Report. Jose Briceno served on 3/6/2020. (Zhong, Meng) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IA 11-2. Counsel Jeffrey A. Feasby to comply with completion and filing of the Verified Petition and Designation of Local Counsel. For your convenience, click on the following link to obtain the form from the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. Upon approval of the Verified Petition, counsel is required to register for the Court's Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system and the electronic service of documents. Please visit the Court's website www.nvd.uscourts.gov to register Attorney. Verified Petition due by 4/18/2020. (no image attached) (MR) |
Filing 3 AO 121 - REPORT on the filing or determination of an action or appeal regarding a copyright. Mailed to the Register of Copyrights, Copyright Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (MR) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by JoshCo Tech, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent JoshCo Group, LLC for JoshCo Tech, LLC added. (Zhong, Meng) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5913909) by JoshCo Tech, LLC. Proof of service due by 6/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (Zhong, Meng) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.