Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys v. Cosme et al
| Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys |
| Synchrony Lending, Inc., Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP, Arquidemes Cosme, Carecredit, LLC, United States of America Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration |
| 2:2020cv00465 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Carecredit, LLC, Synchrony Lending, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Synchrony Financial for Carecredit, LLC, Synchrony Lending, Inc. added. (Tsai, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by Carecredit, LLC, Synchrony Lending, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 6/15/2020.(Tsai, Matthew) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 10
ORDER Granting #9 Motion to Extend Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). Defendants Carecredit, LLC, Synchrony Lending, Inc. answer due 5/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 4/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) Modified on 4/3/2020 (MR). Modified on 4/3/2020 to include defendant names (MMM).
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendants Carecredit, LLC, Synchrony Lending, Inc.. (Tsai, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys re #1 Complaint,,. Carecredit, LLC served on 3/9/2020. (Westbrook, Randolph) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys re #1 Complaint,,. United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration served on 3/9/2020. (Westbrook, Randolph) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys re #1 Complaint,,. Synchrony Lending, Inc. served on 3/11/2020. (Westbrook, Randolph) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Vigil, Abran) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Disclaimer of Interest by Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP re #1 Complaint,,. (Vigil, Abran) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Westbrook, Randolph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5916704) by Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys. Proof of service due by 6/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Westbrook, Randolph) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
