Whittum v. Cash Cow Corporation et al
Leisa E. Whittum |
GreenSquare Corporation and Cash Cow Corporation |
2:2020cv00505 |
March 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Nancy J Koppe |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Defendant Cash Cow Corporation. Responses due by 5/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Lovaas, Aaron) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Cash Cow Corporation. Responses due by 5/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Lovaas, Aaron) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting #11 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (Second Request). Cash Cow Corporation answer due 4/29/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) to Respond to #1 Complaint, by Defendant Cash Cow Corporation. (Lovaas, Aaron) Modified on 4/7/2020 to link to Complaint (SLD). |
Filing 10 ORDER Denying without prejudice #6 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-2(d). ECF No. #6 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(d). Documents must be linked to the document to which they pertain in the electronic filing system. The Clerk has modified the entry to properly establish the docket-entry relationship. Attorney is advised to properly link all further filed documents. Do NOT refile. (no image attached) (MMM) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Cash Cow Corporation. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Lovaas, Aaron) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Aaron David Lovaas on behalf of Defendant Cash Cow Corporation. (Lovaas, Aaron) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Complaint by Defendant Cash Cow Corporation. (Lovaas, Aaron) Modified on 4/5/2020 to add document link (MMM). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leisa E. Whittum re #3 Summons Issued. Cash Cow Corporation served on 3/18/2020. (Krieger, David) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Leisa E. Whittum. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5924307) by Leisa E. Whittum. Proof of service due by 6/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Cash Cow, #3 Summons GreenSquare) (Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.