Breen et al v. MGM Resorts International
| Katharine Breen, Alain Michael, Christopher Pussman, Matthew Pruitt, Carol Oconnel and Adam Metz |
| MGM Resorts International and Sabrina Woods |
| 2:2020cv00541 |
| March 17, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION Stipulation to Consolidate Actions and Set Scheduling Deadlines by Defendant MGM Resorts International. (Bice, Todd) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by MGM Resorts International that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent MGM Resorts International for MGM Resorts International added. (Bice, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Katharine Breen. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Tanasi, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MGM Resorts International (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5930709) by Katharine Breen. Proof of service due by 6/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Tanasi, Richard) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
