Gordon v. K2 Energy Solutions, Inc.
| Richard Gordon |
| K2 Energy Solutions, INC and K2 Energy Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00555 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Session. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 7/20/2020 at 10:00 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. The written evaluation statements must be delivered directly to chambers in a sealed envelope - MARKED CONFIDENTIAL AND DO NOT FILE, not later than 12:00 p.m., 7/13/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/28/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by K2 Energy Solutions, Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Stegall, Kelsey) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by K2 Energy Solutions, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 6/12/2020.(Stegall, Kelsey) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). K2 Energy Solutions, Inc. answer due 4/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 4/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to File Responsive Pleading re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant K2 Energy Solutions, Inc.. (Stegall, Kelsey) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Gordon re #4 Summons Issued. K2 Energy Solutions, Inc. served on 3/24/2020. (Ortuno, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to K2 Energy Solutions, Inc. re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (MR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (MR) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Richard Gordon. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Ortuno, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against K2 Energy Solutions, INC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5933778) by Richard Gordon. Proof of service due by 6/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ADA,ADE,FMLA, #2 Summons as to K2 Energy Solutions, Inc) (Watkins, Daniel) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
