Bates et al v. Walmart Inc.
| Richard Bates and Carole Bates |
| Walmart Inc., Cesar Dubon, Sonia Vides and R. V. |
| 2:2020cv00630 |
| April 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (MR) |
Filing 20
SCHEDULING ORDER Granting #19 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 1/22/2021. Motions due by 2/22/2021. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/23/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/28/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 19 Proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Cross Claimant Walmart Inc., Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Wessel, Megan) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/14/2020. ORDER denying #12 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Court denies the parties' Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order without prejudice due to its failure to correctly cite to and comply with the amended Local Rules. The Local Rules of Practice for the District of Nevada were amended and adopted on April 17, 2020. The parties are directed to review the amendments to the Local Rules, specifically Local Rules 26-1 through 26-7, and re-file a compliant discovery plan. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL) |
| Filing 17 Summons Issued as to Cesar Dubon, R. V., Sonia Vides re #11 Amended Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 16 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued Sonia Vides by Plaintiffs Richard Bates, Carole Bates. (Brenske, William) |
| Filing 15 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued To Minor R.V. by and through her natural parent by Plaintiffs Richard Bates, Carole Bates. (Brenske, William) |
| Filing 14 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued To Cesar Dubon by Plaintiffs Richard Bates, Carole Bates. (Brenske, William) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #11 Amended Complaint (, Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 6/27/2020.), CROSSCLAIM against Cesar Dubon, R. V., Sonia Vides by Walmart Inc.. filed by Walmart Inc..(Wessel, Megan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 12 Proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Wessel, Megan) |
| Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Carole Bates, Richard Bates. Adds new parties. (Brenske, William) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER Granting #9 Stipulation to Substitute Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs are hereby granted leave to amend their Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that #5 , #8 the parties' duplicative stipulations are DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 4/28/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALLOW PLAINTIFFS TO SUBSTITUTE PREVIOUSLY UNIDENTIFIED DEFENDANTS FOR THE DOE DEFENDANTS by Plaintiffs Richard Bates, Carole Bates. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Brenske, William)
|
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALLOW PLAINTIFFS TO SUBSTITUTE PREVIOUSLY UNIDENTIFIED DEFENDANTS FOR THE DOE DEFENDANTS by Plaintiffs Richard Bates, Carole Bates. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Brenske, William) Modified on 4/23/2020 to restrict access to attachment (1) Exhibit pursuant to LR IC 6-1 (DKJ).
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Violation of the Local Rules and Filer Action required. - ERROR : Document #6 was not filed pursuant to FRCP 5.2 and LR IC 6-1 by Attorney William Brenske CORRECTION: Attorney is advised to file a redacted copy for the public record pursuant to LR IC 6-1. Document #6 restricted in accordance with FRCP 5.2 and LR IC 6-1. (no image attached) (DKJ) |
| Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Carole Bates, Richard Bates. Adds new parties. (Brenske, William) Modified to restrict access per LR IC 6-1 on 4/22/2020 (MR). |
|
Filing 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ALLOW PLAINTFFS TO SUBSTITUTE PREVIOUSLY UNIDENTIFIED DEFENDANTS FOR THE DOE DEFENDANTS by Plaintiffs Richard Bates, Carole Bates. (Brenske, William)
|
| Filing 4 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Wessel, Megan) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Walmart Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Wessel, Megan) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/1/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 4/16/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 5/1/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Clark County District Court, Case Number A-19-805939-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5949778) by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (Wessel, Megan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
