Whittingham v. Attorney General's Office
| Peter Whittingham and Byford Peter Whittingham |
| Attorney General's Office |
| 2:2020cv00811 |
| May 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Attorney General's Office. Responses due by 7/15/2020. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 8/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1) (Alanis, Michelle) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Byford Peter Whittingham. Attorney General's Office served on 5/12/2020. (Foley, Jenny)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER Granting #6 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: #1 Complaint. Attorney General's Office answer due 7/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 5/29/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Association of Counsel by Gerald L. Tan on behalf of Defendant Attorney General's Office. (Tan, Gerald)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #6 Stipulation by Defendant Attorney General's Office. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Alanis, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 7
CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #6 . ERROR: Document reflects an incorrect case number. Counsel is advised to correct the discrepancy and file a Notice of Corrected Image/Document and link to #6 . (no image attached) (DKJ)
|
|
Filing 6
VIEW #8 corrected image re First STIPULATION and Order Extending Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Attorney General's Office. (Alanis, Michelle) Modified on 5/28/2020 (DKJ).
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (JQC)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Issued as to Attorney General's Office, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General re #1 Complaint. (JQC)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (JQC)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Peter Whittingham. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Foley, Jenny)
|
|
Filing 1
First COMPLAINT against Attorney General's Office (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5992968) by Peter Whittingham. Proof of service due by 8/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed Summons to be executed, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Foley, Jenny) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
