Stewart v. Walmart Inc.
| Renee Stewart |
| Walmart Inc. and Walmart Inc. doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter #3351 |
| 2:2020cv00985 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Richard F Boulware |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (MR) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER Granting #8 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 12/21/2020. Motions due by 1/20/2021. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/19/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 7/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Wessel, Megan) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Renee Stewart. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Ruiz, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Non-Compliance with Local Rule LR IA 11-1. Attorney Nickolas Giorgione has not been admitted to the bar of this Court. Attorney advised to comply with the admission requirements of this Court. Admission forms are available on the Court's website at www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (no image attached) (MMM) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Wessel, Megan) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Walmart Inc.. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Wessel, Megan) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/2/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 6/17/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 7/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (MR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Clark County Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-20-813009-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-6025051) by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (Wessel, Megan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
