Morales v. Government Employees Insurance Company
| Colette Morales |
| Government Employees Insurance Company and Government Employees Insurance Company doing business as GEICO |
| 2:2020cv01098 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| James C Mahan |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Stipulation to Extend Time to Oppose #5 Motion to Dismiss and #6 Motion to Stay Case. Responses due by 8/24/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Third Request) re #5 Motion to Dismiss, #6 Motion to Stay Case by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company. (Hansard, Wade) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Stipulation to Extend Time to Oppose #5 Motion to Dismiss and #6 Motion to Stay. Responses due 8/9/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) Modified to add new deadlines and to link to motions on 7/30/2020 (EDS).
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) re #5 Motion to Dismiss, #6 Motion to Stay Case by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company. (Hansard, Wade) |
| Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Colette Morales. (Bemis, John) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #8 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #5 Motion to Dismiss, #6 Motion to Stay Case (First Request). Responses due by 7/22/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re: Response re #5 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company. (Hansard, Wade) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Case by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company. (Hansard, Wade) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company. Responses due by 7/8/2020. (Hansard, Wade) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 6/17/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 7/2/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 7/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by GEICO Casualty Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Other Affiliate Government Employees Insurance Company for GEICO Casualty Company added. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant GEICO Casualty Company. (Carlson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court Clark, County Nevada, Case Number A-20-811557-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-6047527) by GEICO Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carlson, Jonathan) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (ADR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
