Underwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Amanda Underwood
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2020cv01237
Filed: July 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amanda Underwood. Commissioner of Social Security served on 7/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Summons Executed on the Attorney General of USA, Department of Justice, #2 Summons Executed on the Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, SSA) (Chermol, David)
July 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Marcelo N Illarmo on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Illarmo, Marcelo)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Verified Petition for Permission for David F. Chermol to Practice Pro Hac Vice and approving Designation of Local Counsel Hal Taylor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/22/2020. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
July 21, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by David F. Chermol and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Hal Taylor (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-6092537) by Plaintiff Amanda Underwood. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Cert. Good Standing) (Taylor, Hal)
July 2, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (JM)
July 2, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (JM) (JM). Modified to attach on 7/2/2020 (JM).
July 2, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Amanda Underwood. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal)
July 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-6067942) by Amanda Underwood. Proof of service due by 9/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, #2 Summons OGC, #3 Summons USAG, #4 Summons USAO) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified on 7/2/2020 (JM).
July 2, 2020 Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (JM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Underwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Underwood
Represented By: Hal Taylor
Represented By: David F. Chermol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Marcelo N Illarmo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?