Sharif-Pour v. United States of America
| Nanda Sharif-Pour |
| United States of America dba United States Postal Service and United States of America ex rel doing business as United States Postal Service |
| 2:2020cv01271 |
| July 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service re #2 Summons Issued as to USA by Plaintiff Nanda Sharif-Pour. (Moss, Boyd) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Nanda Sharif-Pour. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Moss, Boyd) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to United States of America ex rel, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (JQC) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (JQC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nanda Sharif-Pour (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-6074462) by Nanda Sharif-Pour. Proof of service due by 10/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Moss, Boyd) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
