Pacheco Morant v. Wolf et al
| Aracely Pacheco Morant |
| Matthew T Albence, Cantrell, Maya S Timis, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Hon Sandra Anderson, Nichole Wells, Zhou and Chad Wolf |
| 2:2020cv01292 |
| July 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Kent J Dawson |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Issued as to U.S. Attorney. (JM) |
| Filing 15 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued U S Attorney by Plaintiff Aracely Pacheco Morant. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aracely Pacheco Morant re #10 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint,. Cantrell served on 7/27/2020. (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aracely Pacheco Morant re #10 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint,. Zhou served on 7/27/2020. (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aracely Pacheco Morant re #10 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint,. Maya S Timis served on 7/27/2020. (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for #10 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Aracely Pacheco Morant. (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 10 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants by Aracely Pacheco Morant. No changes to parties. (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 9 CLIENT VERIFICATION re #1 Complaint, by attorney Brian J Ramsey on behalf of Plaintiff Aracely Pacheco Morant. (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aracely Pacheco Morant re #1 Complaint,. Matthew T Albence served on 7/23/2020; Sandra Anderson served on 7/23/2020; Cantrell served on 7/23/2020; Kenneth Cuccinelli served on 7/23/2020; Maya S Timis served on 7/24/2020; Chad Wolf served on 7/24/2020; Zhou served on 7/24/2020. (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Cantrell, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (JM) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued DO CANTRELL by Plaintiff Aracely Pacheco Morant. (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to All Defendants, Chad Wolf, Matthew T Albence, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Hon Sandra Anderson, Maya S Timis, Nichole Wells, Zhou U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (JM) Modified text on 7/23/2020 (DKJ). |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued to all defendants, Chad Wolf, Matthew T Albence, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Hon Sandra Anderson, Maya S Timis, Nichole Wells, Zhou by Plaintiff Aracely Pacheco Morant. (Ramsey, Brian) Modified on 7/23/2020 to reflect correct defendants (DKJ). |
| Filing 3 ADDENDUM to #2 Appendix by Plaintiff Aracely Pacheco Morant. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Vol II, #2 Appendix Vol III, #3 Appendix Vol IV, #4 Appendix Vol V) (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Filing 2 APPENDIX VOL I-III to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Aracely Pacheco Morant. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Vol I, #2 Appendix Vol II) (Ramsey, Brian) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (JM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-6078929) by Aracely Pacheco Moran. Proof of service due by 10/9/2020. (Ramsey, Brian) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
