JGB Vegas Retail Lessee, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company
| JGB Vegas Retail Lessee, LLC |
| Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
| 2:2020cv01366 |
| July 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Kent J Dawson |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Granting #9 Stipulation to Remand. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/1/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: Certified Copy of Order and Docket Sheet Sent to State Court - JQC)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT Concerning Removal by Defendant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Gorlin, Lee) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION to Remand by Plaintiff JGB Vegas Retail Lessee, LLC. (Springmeyer, Don) Modified text on 8/12/2020 (MMM). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re #6 Statement in Removal Case by Defendant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Gorlin, Lee) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #6 . ERROR: Document is not in compliance with LR IC 2-2(c) as the title of the document does not match the body of the document. Counsel is advised to correct the discrepancy and file a Notice of Corrected Image/Document and link to #6 . (no image attached) (DKJ) |
| Filing 6 VIEW #8 corrected image re STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Gorlin, Lee) Modified on 8/7/2020 (DKJ). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #4 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: #1 Petition for Removal. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company answer due 8/13/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 7/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Petition for Removal, by Defendant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Samberg, Amy) Modified text on 7/29/2020 (MMM). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Kent J. Dawson on 7/23/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/7/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 8/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Starr Global Financial, Inc., Other Affiliate Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Other Affiliate Starr International Company Inc., Other Affiliate Starr Insurance Holdings, inc., Other Affiliate Starr Global Holdings AG for Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company added. (Gorlin, Lee) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-20-816628-B, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-6096015) by Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gorlin, Lee) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
