Brown v. Starbucks Corporation et al
| Mr. Thomas Brown and Thomas Brown |
| Starbucks Corporation, Hunter Capitulo, Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company doing business as Starbucks and Siena VII Holding Limited Partnership |
| 2:2020cv01477 |
| August 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| James C Mahan |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/25/2020.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Certified Docket and Order to State Court - JM)
|
| Filing 18 REPLY to Response to #7 Motion to Remand to State Court, by Plaintiff Thomas Brown. (Friedman, Blake) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE IB 2-2: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c) and FRCP 73, the parties in this action are provided with a link to the "AO 85 Notice of Availability, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge" form on the Court's website - #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. AO 85 Consent forms should NOT be electronically filed. Upon consent of all parties, counsel are advised to manually file the form with the Clerk's Office. (A copy of form AO 85 has been mailed to parties not receiving electronic service.) (no image attached) (JM) |
|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER granting #15 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 2/3/2021. Motions due by 3/5/2021. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/10/2020.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
| Filing 15 Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Thomas Brown. (Friedman, Blake) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #7 Motion to Remand to State Court, by Defendants Hunter Capitulo, Siena VII Holding Limited Partnership, Starbucks Corporation. Replies due by 9/16/2020. (Rivera, Lynn) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Siena VII Holding Limited Partnership. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Rivera, Lynn) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Filer's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #10 . Attorney Christian L. Augustin is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (MMM) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Filer's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #10 . Attorney Blake S. Friedman is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (MMM) |
| Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Thomas Brown. (Friedman, Blake) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-2(d). ECF No. #8 was not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(d). Documents must be linked to the document to which they pertain in the electronic filing system. The Clerk has modified the entry to properly establish the docket-entry relationship. Attorney is advised to properly link all further filed documents. DO NOT refile. (no image attached) (MMM) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Manual Filing by Plaintiff Thomas Brown. Object: CD, re Exhibit 2 as to #7 MOTION to Remand manually filed with the Clerk's Office. (Friedman, Blake) Modified on 8/24/2020 to add docket entry relationship (MMM). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Thomas Brown. Responses due by 9/7/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 911 Tapes, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 Pres Letter and Email, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 Affidavits of Service, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 Prior Orders) (Friedman, Blake) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Hunter Capitulo, Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Rivera, Lynn) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Thomas Brown. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Friedman, Blake) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 8/10/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 8/25/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 9/9/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (MR) |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Case Number A-20-817587-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-6118372) by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration Declaration of Lynn V. Rivera in Support of Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Petition for Removal, #3 Certificate of Service) (Rivera, Lynn) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings by Hunter Capitulo, Starbucks Corporation. (Rivera, Lynn) |
| Filing 1 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Hunter Capitulo, Starbucks Corporation. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Rivera, Lynn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
