Marscheck v. The Retail Equation
Plaintiff: Laura Marscheck
Defendant: The Retail Equation
Case Number: 2:2020cv01521
Filed: August 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A Dorsey
Referring Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement with The Retail Equation by Laura Marscheck. (Plaksin, Shaina)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting #5 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). The Retail Equation answer due 10/10/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/11/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
September 10, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Docket Correction to #5 Motion to Extend/Shorten Time : ERROR: Incorrect event selected by attorney. CORRECTION: The clerk modified the event from a Motion to a Stipulation pursuant to LR IC 2-2(c). No further action is required at this time. (no image attached) (DKJ)
September 10, 2020 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by The Retail Equation that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent TRE, Intermediate Holding, Inc. for The Retail Equation added. (Jorgensen, J)
September 10, 2020 Filing 5 STIPULATION for Extension of Time MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) TO RESPOND re #1 Complaint, by Defendant The Retail Equation. (Jorgensen, J) Modified event on 9/10/2020 (DKJ).
August 28, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laura Marscheck re #1 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued. The Retail Equation served on 8/20/2020. (Krieger, David)
August 18, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Retail Equation re #1 Complaint. (JQC)
August 18, 2020 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Laura Marscheck. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David)
August 18, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-6131659) by Laura Marscheck. Proof of service due by 11/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons TRE) (Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
August 18, 2020 Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (JQC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marscheck v. The Retail Equation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Marscheck
Represented By: Shaina R Plaksin
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Represented By: Matthew I Knepper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Retail Equation
Represented By: Matthew Ryan Tsai
Represented By: J Christopher Jorgensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?