Davis v. Lombardo et al
| Raymond Tyrone Davis |
| Joe Lombardo and Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
| 2:2020cv01630 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Kent J Dawson |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT this action is dismissed without prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 9/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 3
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner Raymond Davis's #1 -1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case and ENTER final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Joe Lombardo, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:20-cv-01630-KJD-EJY. (MR) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (MR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
