Buckley v. Saul
Plaintiff: John Buckley
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv01724
Filed: September 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Chantal Jenkins on behalf of Defendant Andrew Saul. (Jenkins, Chantal)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed re #6 Summons Issued as to USA. (DRS)
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed re #6 Summons Issued as to USA, #5 Complaint. Attorney General served on 10/5/2020. (DRS) Modified text on 10/9/2020 (SLD).
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed re #6 Summons Issued as to USA, #5 Complaint. Andrew Saul served. (DRS) Modified text on 10/7/2020 (SLD).
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS 7018 3090 0001 1133 4133 and 7018 3090 0001 1133 4126 re #6 Summons Issued as to USA. (DRS)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General re #5 Complaint. (DRS)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by John Buckley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (DRS)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint by certified mail. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service.; Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/25/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Consent for Electronic Service of Documents by Plaintiff John Buckley. (DRS)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. NOTICE of assignment of case to a United States Magistrate Judge and consent form. (Attachments: #1 Consent form) (DRS)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff John Buckley. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4) (DRS) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/17/2020: #6 Exhibit 5) (DRS).
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (DRS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buckley v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Chantal Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Buckley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?