Smith v. State of Nevada et al
| Charles Smith |
| Nevada Department of Corrections, William Hutching and State of Nevada |
| 2:2020cv01781 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
RECEIPT of Payment: $ 5.00, receipt number NVLAS072814. (JQC)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that #1 the application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date that this order is entered to have the filing fee of $5.00 sent to the Clerk of Court. Petitioner shall have 30 days to file an amended petition on the supplied form. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Petition/instructions, original petition sent to P - JQC)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE from USDC advising case against State of Nevada, et al., has been received and assigned case number 2:20-cv-01781-RFB-VCF. (MR)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Charles Smith. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel) (MR)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (RT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
