Washington v. Lippmann et al
Plaintiff: Michael Washington
Defendant: David Jones, Daniel Lippmann and Elizabeth Mercer
Case Number: 2:2020cv01854
Filed: October 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Referring Judge: Gloria M Navarro
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Plaintiff shall be required to pay an initial installment fee in the amount of $16.80 on or before 11/16/2020. The Clerk shall provide TWO copies of this order to Plaintiff, and plaintiff is responsible for making the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this Order attached to the check in the amount of the designated fee. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the attention of the inmate accounts department at Clark County Detention Center, 330 South Casino Center, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/16/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; two copies to plaintiff, one copy to inmate accounts and one copy to NVD-Finance - DRS)(SLD).
October 15, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Washington. (JM)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice. Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee in full or file a proper IFP Application on or before 11/5/2020. The Clerk is instructed to mail the plaintiff the proper form and instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; IFP Application and instructions sent with order to P - DRS)
October 5, 2020 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRS)
October 5, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Washington. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (DRS)
October 5, 2020 Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (RT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Lippmann et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Lippmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elizabeth Mercer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?