Edward Nicholas v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
| Edward Nicholas |
| Indian Harbor Insurance Company |
| 2:2020cv01934 |
| October 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AMENDED CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Indian Harbor Insurance Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliate XL Specialty Insurance Company, Other Affiliate EXEL Holdings Limited, Other Affiliate XL Financial Holdings (Ireland) Limited, Other Affiliate XL Reinsurance America Inc., Other Affiliate XL Bermuda Ltd., Other Affiliate XLIT Ltd., Other Affiliate AXA SA, Other Affiliate XL Group Ltd., Other Affiliate X.L. America, Inc. for Indian Harbor Insurance Company added. (Nitz, Dana) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to 7 Minute Order,,,,, by Defendant Indian Harbor Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E) (Nitz, Dana) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Edward Nicholas. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Rini, Rebekah) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/16/2020. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Indian Harbor Insurance Company show cause as to why the Court should not remand this action to Clark County District Court for failure to satisfy the diversity jurisdiction requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1332. Specifically, Defendant must show that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00. Additionally, Defendant states that it is a Delaware corporation, but fails to specify its principal place of business. See Johnson v. Colombia Props. Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006) ("[A] corporation is a citizen only of (1) the state where its principal place of business is located, and (2) the state in which it is incorporated."). Defendant shall have until December 7, 2020, to file a brief, not to exceed ten pages, demonstrating that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Failure to comply with this Order will result in this case being remanded to Clark County District Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to address the jurisdictional issues implicated by this Order, Plaintiff shall have until December 7, 2020, to file a brief, not to exceed ten pages, discussing the concerns herein raised. |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Indian Harbor Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Accept. of Service) (Nitz, Dana) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Indian Harbor Insurance Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent AXA SA, Other Affiliate XL Specialty Insurance Company, Other Affiliate EXEL Holdings Limited, Other Affiliate XL Financial Holdings (Ireland) Limited, Other Affiliate XL Reinsurance America Inc., Other Affiliate XL America, Inc., Other Affiliate XL Bermuda Ltd., Other Affiliate XLIT Ltd., Other Affiliate XL Group Ltd. for Indian Harbor Insurance Company added. (Nitz, Dana) |
| Filing 4 ERRATA to #1 Petition for Removal,, by Defendant Indian Harbor Insurance Company. (Nitz, Dana) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Judge Navarro's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/19/2020. Statement regarding removed action is due by 11/3/2020. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/18/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Clark County District Court, Case Number A-20-815911-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-6218301) by Indian Harbor Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nitz, Dana) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Edward Nicholas v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Indian Harbor Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Dana Jonathon Nitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edward Nicholas | |
| Represented By: | Rebekah Rini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
