Izmagristo v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Yehuda Izmagristo |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and American Express Company |
2:2020cv01946 |
October 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Nancy J Koppe |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER granting #18 VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Raymond A. Garcia and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Robert R. McCoy. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/17/2020. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #17 VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Brian C. Frontino and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Robert R. McCoy. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/17/2020. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
Filing 18 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Raymond A. Garcia and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Robert R. McCoy (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-6297945) by Defendant American Express Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Permission to Practice Court History, #2 Exhibit Ex B - Certificate of Good Standing - California, #3 Exhibit Ex C - Certificate of Good Standing - New York) (McCoy, Robert) |
Filing 17 MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Brian C. Frontino and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Robert R. McCoy (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-6297922) by Defendant American Express Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Permission to Practice Court History, #2 Exhibit Ex B - Certificate of Good Standing - Florida, #3 Exhibit Ex C - Certificate of Good Standing - California, #4 Exhibit Ex D - Certificate of Good Standing - New York, #5 Exhibit Ex E - Certificate of Good Standing - DC) (McCoy, Robert) |
Filing 16 ERROR NOTICE to counsel re filing of #15 Certificate of Interested Parties,. All interested parties were not properly entered on the docket. Attorney Robert McCoy advised that in the future, Certificates of Interested Parties filed with the District of Nevada shall be filed in accordance with FRCP 7.1 and LR 7.1-1, and shall enter on the docket all persons, associations of person, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. Do NOT refile. (no image attached) (MMM) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by American Express Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliates American Express National Bank, American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. for American Express Company added. Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway for American Express Company added. (McCoy, Robert) Modified on 12/14/2020 to reflect additional affiliates (MMM). |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/14/2020. Each non-governmental party is required to file a certificate of interested parties concurrently with its first appearance in a case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(b)(1); Local Rule 7.1-1(c). Defendant American Express failed to file a certificate of interested parties. Accordingly, Defendant must file a certificate of interested parties no later than December 18, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TM) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by American Express Company.(McCoy, Robert) |
Filing 12 ORDER Granting #11 Stipulation for Extension of Time. American Express Company answer due 12/11/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant American Express Company. (McCoy, Robert) Modified text on 11/17/2020 (MMM). |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Experian plc, Other Affiliate Central Source LLC, Other Affiliate Online Data Exchange LLC, Other Affiliate New Management Services LLC, Other Affiliate Vantagescore Solutions LLC, Other Affiliate Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. added. (Sharples, Andrew) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/27/2020.(Sharples, Andrew) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE of violation of Local Rules ECF No. #7 was not filed pursuant to LR IA 10-2. Incomplete case number on document. The correct case number is 2:20-cv-01946-APG-NJK.Attorney Robert M. Tzall is advised in the future to file documents pursuant to the Local Rules. No further action is required concerning this document at this time. Do NOT refile. (no image attached) (MMM) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Yehuda Izmagristo. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Tzall, Robert) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to American Express Company, Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (JQC) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE of violation of Local Rules. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #2 . Document not properly formatted per LR IA 10-1(a)(1). Also, title of pleading in caption does not match body of pleading. Counsel is advised to correct the deficiencies and refile using the event Notice of Corrected Image/Document and link to #2 . Do not link to this notice. (no image attached) (MMM) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IC 2-1(g). Filer's account information is different from the address information contained in the filed document, ECF No. #1 . Attorney Robert M. Tzall is advised to review and update his/her user account information. (no image attached) (MMM) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JQC) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Yehuda Izmagristo. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Tzall, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Express Company, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-6220559) by Yehuda Izmagristo. Proof of service due by 1/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons amex, #3 Summons experian) (Tzall, Robert) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.