Mlodik v. Amazon.com Services, Inc
| Leann Mlodik |
| Amazon.com Services, Inc |
| 2:2020cv02023 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Jennifer A Dorsey |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Amazon.com Services, Inc that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliate Amazon.com Services, LLC for Amazon.com Services, Inc added. (Krincek, Wendy) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/22/2021.(Krincek, Wendy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Filing 9
ORDER SCHEDULING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION SESSION. An ENE session has been scheduled to commence by video conference at 10:00 a.m., February 1, 2021, before U.S. Magistrate Judge, Cam Ferenbach. It is the responsibility of the parties to set-up and coordinate the video conference for the ENE. Each party may choose to use any video conference software/app to conduct the ENE. The court will conduct simultaneous video conferences with each party during the ENE and will need a separate video conference link from each party. Each party must then send an invitation link for the ENE to VCF_Chambers@nvd.uscourts.gov by January 25, 2021. Each party must contact chambers (702-464-5540) by January 25, 2021 and be prepared to do a test run of the video conference with chambers on January 26, 2021. A request for an exception to the attendance requirements must be submitted to the undersigned for approval at least two weeks prior to the ENE session. The written evaluation statements must be delivered to chamber or (if statements and exhibits are over 100 pages, please send in multiple e-mails.) emailed to VCF_Chambers@nvd.uscourts.gov, not later than 4:00 p.m., January 25, 2021. DO NOT FILE. DO NOT MAIL THEM TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE. DO NOT SERVE A COPY ON OPPOSING COUNSEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/20/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Response to #1 Complaint. Amazon.com Services, Inc. answer due 12/8/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/20/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Amazon.com Services, Inc. (Thomas, Ethan) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE regarding ECF No. #5 . Document was not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(c) by attorney Ivy Gage. The wrong event was selected. The Court has corrected and changed the event from Declaration to Summons Returned Executed. No further action is required. Do not refile document. (no image attached) (SLD) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed DECLARATION of Service re #1 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued. Amazon.com Services, Inc. served on 11/3/2020, by Plaintiff Leann Mlodik. (Gage, Ivy) Modified on 11/16/2020 to change event (SLD). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Leann Mlodik. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Gage, Ivy) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Amazon.com Services, Inc re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (MR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-6239488) by Leann Mlodik. Proof of service due by 1/31/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Summ,ons) (Gage, Ivy) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mlodik v. Amazon.com Services, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leann Mlodik | |
| Represented By: | Ivy Gage |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.com Services, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Wendy M. Krincek |
| Represented By: | Ethan Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
