Yumbe v. Mead et al
| El Yumbe |
| Stephen F. Sisolak doing business as Steve Sisolak, Office of the Attorney General (Nevada), Clark County District Attorney, Donald Graham, State of Nevada, Joseph S. Sciscento, Joseph M. Bonaventure doing business as Joe M Bonaventure, Aaron Darnell Ford doing business as Aaron D. Ford, Kenneth Mead, Nelson, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Clark County, Ann E Zimmerman and Matthew J Christian doing business as Matthew J Christian |
| 2:2020cv02065 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of NON-OPPOSITION to #4 Motion to Dismiss and #5 Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Clark County, Clark County District Attorney. (Browning, Joel) Modified event on 12/22/2020 and added additional document link (MMM). |
| Filing 10 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendants Matthew J Christian, Donald Graham, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Kenneth Mead. (Anderson, Lyssa) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Matthew J Christian, Donald Graham, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Kenneth Mead. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Anderson, Lyssa) |
| Filing 8 JOINDER to #5 Motion to Dismiss,, by Defendants Clark County, Clark County District Attorney. (Browning, Joel) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/3/2020. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #5 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/3/2020. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #4 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Defendants Matthew J Christian, Donald Graham, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Kenneth Mead. Responses due by 12/16/2020. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/16/2021. (Anderson, Lyssa) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Defendants Clark County, Clark County District Attorney. Responses due by 12/3/2020. (Browning, Joel) |
| Filing 3 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (Attachments: #1 Notice/Consent to Email) (MR) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400) by El Yumbe. Proof of service due by 2/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt No. NVLAS072716) (MR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
