Neroes v. Backgroundchecks.com
| Roosevelt Neroes |
| Backgroundchecks.com |
| 2:2020cv02307 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Stipulation to Extend deadline to file responsive pleading to #1 Complaint; Backgroundchecks.com answer due 3/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 2/16/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Backgroundchecks.com. (Dickinson, Diana) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roosevelt Neroes re #3 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint,. Backgroundchecks.com served on 12/23/2020. (Krieger, David) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Stipulation for Extension of Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). Backgroundchecks.com answer due 2/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 1/11/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Backgroundchecks.com. (Dickinson, Diana) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Backgroundchecks.com re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Roosevelt Neroes. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6301599) by Roosevelt Neroes. Proof of service due by 3/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Background) (Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Neroes v. Backgroundchecks.com | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roosevelt Neroes | |
| Represented By: | David H. Krieger |
| Represented By: | Shawn Wayne Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Backgroundchecks.com | |
| Represented By: | Diana Dickinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
