Christensen v. Eight Judicial District Court et al
Lorna Christensen |
William Potter, Boyer Law Group, Nevada Guardian Services, LLC, Gloria Sturman, Eight Judicial District Court, Kim Boyer and Susan Hoy |
2:2020cv02317 |
December 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Richard F Boulware |
Cam Ferenbach |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Lorna Christensen. Proof of service due by 4/7/2021. (JM) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/7/2021.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 5 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 402, receipt number NVLAS073473 (JM) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Lis Pendens by Plaintiff Lorna Christensen. (JM) |
Filing 3 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent to Service by Email) (Both documents mailed to P this date - DRS) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (DRS) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Lis Pendens by Plaintiff Lorna Christensen. (DRS) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Lorna Christensen. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Injunction, #2 Cover email, #3 Proposed Summons) (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.