Portillo et al v. United States
| Emely Johana Portillo and Eva Lilian Leonzo de Portillo |
| United States |
| 2:2021cv00006 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE of violation of Local Rules. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #10 . Document was not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(c). The wrong event was selected. The title of the docket entry does not match the title of the document. Counsel is advised to refile ECF No. #10 using the appropriate docket entry event "Summons Returned Executed". (no image attached) (MMM) |
| Filing 10 ERROR: Wrong event selected by filing attorney. AFFIDAVIT of Service re #9 Summons Issued by Plaintiffs Eva Lilian Leonzo de Portillo, Emely Johana Portillo. (Stovall, Leslie) Document #10 terminated as filed in error. Modified on 2/1/2021 (MMM). |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to United States. (JQC) |
| Filing 8 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued United States by Plaintiff Emely Johana Portillo. (Stovall, Leslie) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE and Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #6 . Proposed summons was not properly completed; it is missing the contact information for plaintiff's counsel.Attorney Leslie Stovall is advised to complete the summons form and refile using the appropriate "Proposed Summons to be Issued" docket entry event. (no image attached) (MMM) |
| Filing 6 ERROR: document not properly completed; missing attorney information. PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued United States by Plaintiff Emely Johana Portillo. (Stovall, Leslie) Document #6 terminated as filed in error. Modified on 1/5/2021 (MMM). |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of violation of Local Rules. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #3 . Document was not filed pursuant to LR IC 2-2(c). The wrong event was selected. The title of the docket entry does not match the title of the document.Counsel is advised to refile using the appropriate "Proposed Summons to be Issued" docket entry event. (no image attached) (MMM) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Richard F. Boulware, II. Judge Boulware's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
| Filing 3 ERROR: Wrong event selected by filing attorney. SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Emely Johana Portillo as to United States. (Stovall, Leslie) Document #3 terminated as filed in error. Modified on 1/4/2021 (MMM). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Emely Johana Portillo. (Stovall, Leslie) |
| Filing 1 First COMPLAINT against United States (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6314348) by Emely Johana Portillo. Proof of service due by 4/4/2021. (Stovall, Leslie) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (JQC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
