Stokes v. BJ's Restaurant Operations Company
Veronica P. Stokes |
BJ's Restaurant Operations Company doing business as BJ's Restaurant Inc |
2:2021cv00099 |
January 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Cam Ferenbach |
James C Mahan |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Civil Case Terminated. (DRS) |
![]() |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by BJ's Restaurant Operations Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent BJ's Restaurants, Inc., Other Affiliate BJROC Maryland, LLC, Other Affiliate BJs Restaurant Operations Company, Other Affiliate BJ's Restaurant Operations Company of Kansas, LLC for BJ's Restaurant Operations Company added. (Burden, Jack) |
Filing 6 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court re #4 Motion to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Veronica P. Stokes. Responses due by 2/4/2021. (Hanratty, Kevin) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Veronica P. Stokes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Hanratty, Kevin) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court re #1 Petition for Removal,, by Plaintiff Veronica P. Stokes. Responses due by 2/4/2021. (Hanratty, Kevin) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Veronica P. Stokes that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. (Hanratty, Kevin) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 1/19/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 2/3/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 2/18/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from eighth Judicial District, Case Number a-20-825390-c, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6335088) by BJ's Restaurant Operations Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Index Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G) (Burden, Jack) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (DRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stokes v. BJ's Restaurant Operations Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Veronica P. Stokes | |
Represented By: | Kevin M. Hanratty |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BJ's Restaurant Operations Company doing business as BJ's Restaurant Inc | |
Represented By: | Jack P. Burden |
Represented By: | Jacquelyn Michelle Franco |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.