Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC v. Faison et al
Petitioner: Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC
Respondent: Michelle R Faison and Lawrence Erwin Faison
Case Number: 2:2021cv00107
Filed: January 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Gordon
Referring Judge: Nancy J Koppe
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2021 Filing 22 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Petitioner Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC and against Respondents Lawrence Erwin Faison and Michelle R. Faison in the amount of $122,401.15 (comprised of $105,549.86 damages and $16,851.29 accrued interest). Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 9/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER Granting #1 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and ORDER Granting #20 Motion for Default Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC and against defendants Lawrence Erwin Faison and Michelle R. Faison in the amount of $122,401.15 (comprised of $105,549.86 damages and $16,851.29 accrued interest). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that post-judgment interest shall accrue on the judgment from the date of entry until paid in full, as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 1961.Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/3/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
September 3, 2021 Filing 20 MOTION for Default Judgment re 19 QC Notice, #16 Clerk's Entry of Default, #17 Order, by Petitioner Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Silvestri, Phillip)
September 3, 2021 Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE. Attorney Action Required to ECF No. #18 MOTION for Judgment. The wrong event was selected. Counsel is advised to refile ECF No. #18 using the appropriate docket entry event, "Motion Default Judgment". (no image attached) (EDS)
September 3, 2021 Filing 18 MOTION for Judgment re #16 Clerk's Entry of Default, #17 Order, by Petitioner Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC. Responses due by 9/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Silvestri, Phillip)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re #16 Clerk's Entry of Default. The petitioner should move for default judgment or take some other action regarding its petition by 9/3/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/6/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
June 11, 2021 Filing 16 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Lawrence Erwin Faison, Michelle R Faison re #15 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. (DKJ)
May 28, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION for Entry of Clerk's Default by Petitioner Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC. Responses due by 6/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order) (Silvestri, Phillip)
May 28, 2021 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC re #1 Motion,,. (Silvestri, Phillip)
May 28, 2021 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC re #1 Motion,,. (Silvestri, Phillip)
May 4, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of intent to dismiss pursuant to FRCP 4(m). The * Petition* in this action was filed on* 1/20/2021.* To date no proper proof of service has been filed as to*Lawrence Erwin Faison and Michelle R Faison.* FRCP 4(m) dismissal deadline set for 6/3/2021. (EDS)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying #10 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/29/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
March 26, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Entry of Clerk's Default by Petitioner Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC. Responses due by 4/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1- Default) (Silvestri, Phillip)
March 26, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC. Lawrence Erwin Faison served on 2/7/2021. (Silvestri, Phillip)
March 26, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC. Michelle R Faison served on 2/7/2021. (Silvestri, Phillip)
February 2, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Lawrence Erwin Faison, Michelle R Faison. (HAM)
February 2, 2021 Filing 6 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Petitioner Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC. (Silvestri, Phillip)
February 2, 2021 Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Petitioner Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC. (Silvestri, Phillip)
January 20, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Diamond Resorts Corporation, Corporate Parent Diamond Resorts International, Inc., Corporate Parent Dakota Parent, Inc., Corporate Parent Diamond Resorts Developer and Sales Holding Company, Corporate Parent Dakota Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate Apollo Global Management, LLC for Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC added. (Silvestri, Phillip)
January 20, 2021 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
January 20, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (MR)
January 20, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION to Confirm an Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment COMPLAINT against Lawrence Erwin Faison, Michelle R Faison (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6336999) by Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC. Proof of service due by 4/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons) (Silvestri, Phillip) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified event on 1/20/2021 (MMM).
January 20, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (MR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC v. Faison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC
Represented By: Phillip A. Silvestri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michelle R Faison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lawrence Erwin Faison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?