Williams v. Hutchings et al
| Ronald C. Williams |
| NDOC OMD, William Hutchings and NDOC |
| 2:2021cv00123 |
| January 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Kent J Dawson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
LETTER from Ronald Williams regarding receipt of #5 Amended Complaint and #4 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (HAM)
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT by Ronald C. Williams. (HAM)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ronald C. Williams. (HAM)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; IFP/Payment of filing fees due 3/26/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 1/25/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: IFP form/instructions to P - HAM)
|
|
Filing 2
ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (HAM)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ronald C. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Application to Appeal In Forma Pauperis, #2 Complaint) (HAM)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (RT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
