Shrum v. Midland Credit Management, Inc
Joan Shrum |
Midland Credit Management, Inc |
2:2021cv00255 |
February 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Kent J Dawson |
Elayna J Youchah |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Granting #8 Motion to Extend Time re #1 Complaint (Second Request). Midland Credit Management, Inc answer due 5/7/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time (Second Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Planet, Brandi) Modified text on 3/30/2021 (MMM). |
Filing 7 ORDER Granting #5 Motion to Extend Time re 1 Complaint (First Request). Midland Credit Management, Inc answer due 4/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/11/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Midland Credit Management, Inc that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Encore Capital Group, Inc. for Midland Credit Management, Inc added. (Planet, Brandi) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Planet, Brandi) Modified text on 3/11/2021 (MMM). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joan Shrum re #1 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued. Midland Credit Management, Inc served on 2/23/2021. (Krieger, David) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Midland Credit Management, Inc re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Joan Shrum. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6370834) by Joan Shrum. Proof of service due by 5/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Midland) (Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shrum v. Midland Credit Management, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc | |
Represented By: | Brandi M. Planet |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joan Shrum | |
Represented By: | David H. Krieger |
Represented By: | Shawn Wayne Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.