Shrum v. Midland Credit Management, Inc
Plaintiff: Joan Shrum
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc
Case Number: 2:2021cv00255
Filed: February 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Kent J Dawson
Referring Judge: Elayna J Youchah
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Granting #8 Motion to Extend Time re #1 Complaint (Second Request). Midland Credit Management, Inc answer due 5/7/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
March 29, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time (Second Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Planet, Brandi) Modified text on 3/30/2021 (MMM).
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Granting #5 Motion to Extend Time re 1 Complaint (First Request). Midland Credit Management, Inc answer due 4/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/11/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
March 11, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Midland Credit Management, Inc that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Encore Capital Group, Inc. for Midland Credit Management, Inc added. (Planet, Brandi)
March 11, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time (First Request) re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Planet, Brandi) Modified text on 3/11/2021 (MMM).
March 5, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joan Shrum re #1 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued. Midland Credit Management, Inc served on 2/23/2021. (Krieger, David)
February 16, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Midland Credit Management, Inc re #1 Complaint. (MR)
February 16, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Joan Shrum. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Krieger, David)
February 16, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6370834) by Joan Shrum. Proof of service due by 5/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Midland) (Krieger, David) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
February 16, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (MR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shrum v. Midland Credit Management, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc
Represented By: Brandi M. Planet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joan Shrum
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Represented By: Shawn Wayne Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?