Tanzey v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Iman Tanzey
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv00448
Filed: March 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Kent J Dawson
Referring Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2021 Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT Concerning Removal by Defendant DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.. (McCoy, Robert)
March 31, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 5/15/2021.(McCoy, Robert) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
March 30, 2021 Filing 5 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Minute Order (ECF No. 3)) (McCoy, Robert)
March 22, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Iman Tanzey. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kerbow, Ryan)
March 18, 2021 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/18/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 4/2/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 4/17/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
March 18, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Johnson & Johnson, Other Affiliate DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. for DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. added. (McCoy, Robert)
March 18, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, District of Nevada, Case Number A-20-823293-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6411390) by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex B - Summons to DePuy, #4 Exhibit Ex C - Ex Parte Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve, #5 Exhibit Ex D - Affidavit of Service) (McCoy, Robert) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
March 18, 2021 Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (HAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tanzey v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Represented By: Robert R. McCoy
Represented By: Sihomara L. Graves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Iman Tanzey
Represented By: Scott Poisson
Represented By: Ryan Kerbow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?