Wair v. Roy et al
Diane Wair |
Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC and Steven Roy |
2:2021cv00450 |
March 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Andrew P Gordon |
Brenda Weksler |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER Remanding Case for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. The clerk of the court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Certified copy of Order and Docket Sheet to State Court - YAW) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to #7 Order to Show Cause by Defendants Steven Roy, Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Tilton, Analise) |
Filing 8 NOTICE SERVICE OF MINUTES OF THE COURT DATED MARCH 18, 2018 by Steven Roy, Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Tilton, Analise) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Remanded for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Show Cause Response due by 4/9/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Regarding Local Rule IA 11-1. Attorney Ellsie E. Lucero is in violation of Local Rule IA 11-1. It appears Ellsie E. Lucero is not a member of this court's bar. Please visit the Court's website at #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. and complete the Admissions Form. (no image attached) (DKJ) Modified on 3/18/2021 to correct hyperlink (DKJ). |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/18/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 4/2/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 4/17/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Steven Roy, Swift Transportation Co of AZ (i/s/h/a Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case Corporate Parent Knight-Swift Holdings, Inc., Swift Transportation Co of AZ. added (Tilton, Analise) Modified on 3/18/2021 to add corporate parent (DKJ). |
Filing 2 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Steven Roy, Swift Transportation Co of AZ (i/s/h/a Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC. (Tilton, Analise) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court Nevada, Case Number A-20-824471-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6411714) by Steven Roy, Swift Transportation Co of AZ (i/s/h/a Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Tilton, Analise) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.