Estate of John Cronin et al v. G4 Dental Enterprises LLC et al
| Estate of John Cronin, Kylee Cronin, Jocelyn Cronin and Sam Cronin |
| Arshid Torkaman, G4 Dental Enterprises LLC doing business as G4 by Golpa, Mike Golpa, Anna Shagharyan and Scott Young |
| 2:2021cv00495 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| James C Mahan |
| Brenda Weksler |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER Granting #11 Stipulation to Remand and Withdrawing #9 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/2/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Certified Copy of Order and Docket Sheet to State Court - MR)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER to Consolidate Cases. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that case number 2:21-cv-00496-GMN-VCF is consolidated with case number 2:21-cv-00495-JCM-BNW. Case number 2:21-cv-00495-JCM-BNW shall serve as the lead case. The parties must file all further filings in the lead case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that case number 2:21-cv-00496-GMN-VCF is reassigned to District Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Brenda N. Weksler for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/31/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Remand and to Withdraw #9 Motion to Remand by Defendant Arshid Torkaman. (Vogel, Stephen) Modified text on 4/1/2021 and added document link(MMM). |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #5 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages by Plaintiffs Jocelyn Cronin, Kylee Cronin, Sam Cronin, Estate of John Cronin. Replies due by 4/6/2021. (Gutierrez, Siria) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court re #1 Petition for Removal,, by Plaintiffs Jocelyn Cronin, Kylee Cronin, Sam Cronin, Estate of John Cronin. Responses due by 4/13/2021. (Gutierrez, Siria) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant Arshid Torkaman. (Garth, Adam) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Order by Arshid Torkaman re #4 Minute Order Removal Case,. (Garth, Adam) |
| Filing 6 EXHIBIT Amended Ex. C to Petition to #1 Petition for Removal,, by Defendant Arshid Torkaman. (Garth, Adam) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Defendant Arshid Torkaman. (Garth, Adam) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan on 3/25/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 4/9/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 4/24/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Arshid Torkaman. (Garth, Adam) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Arshid Torkaman, DDS. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Garth, Adam) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-20-824239-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6420412) by Arshid Torkaman, DDS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Garth, Adam) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
