Bank of New York Mellon v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. et al
Bank Of New York Mellon |
Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company |
2:2021cv00529 |
March 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Kent J Dawson |
Cam Ferenbach |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bank Of New York Mellon re #1 Petition for Removal,,. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. served on 3/31/2021. (Brenner, Darren) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bank Of New York Mellon re #1 Petition for Removal,,. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company served on 3/22/2021. (Brenner, Darren) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Stipulation to Stay Case. Case is stayed until further order of this court. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 5/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION to Stay Case Pending Wells Fargo II Appeal by Defendants Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., Fidelity National Title Insurance Company. (Sinclair, Kevin) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., Fidelity National Title Insurance Company. (Sinclair, Kevin) |
Filing 6 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Removed Case by Defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company. (Sinclair, Kevin) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Stipulation to Extend time to Answer; Re: #1 Petition/Complaint. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company answers due 5/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/9/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) to respond to complaint by Defendants Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., Fidelity National Title Insurance Company. (Sinclair, Kevin) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., Fidelity National Title Insurance Company that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Corporate Parent FNTG HOLDINGS, LLC for Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., Fidelity National Title Insurance Company added. (Sinclair, Kevin) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Kent J. Dawson on 4/1/2021. Statement regarding removed action is due by 4/16/2021. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 5/1/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
Attorney update in case: Attorney Gary L. Compton for Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.,Gary L. Compton for Fidelity National Title Insurance Company added. (DRS) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Kent J. Dawson and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (DRS) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-21-830785-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0978-6428896) by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company. Proof of service due by 6/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 (Complaint), #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 (Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure), #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Gizer, Scott) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.