Avila v. Saul
Plaintiff: Jose N. Avila
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2021cv00546
Filed: April 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Referring Judge: Brenda Weksler
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Marcelo N Illarmo on behalf of Defendant Andrew Saul. (Illarmo, Marcelo)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Certified mail returned 7018 3090 0001 1133 1729 re #8 Notice of Certified mail. (JQC)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed re #7 Summons Issued as to USA. Andrew Saul served on 4/13/2021. (JQC)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Certified Mail 7018 3090 0001 1133 1736 & 7018 3090 0001 1133 1729 re #5 Order, #6 Complaint, #7 Summons. (JQC)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (cc: USM - JQC)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by Jose N. Avila. Proof of service due by 7/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (JQC)
April 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that #1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff is permitted to maintain the action to conclusion without the necessity of prepayment of any additional fees, costs, or security. This order granting in forma pauperis status does not extend to the issuance of subpoenas at government expense. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
April 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach for all further proceedings. All further documents must bear the correct case number 2:21-cv-00546-VCF. (no image attached) (AF)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (MMM)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Jose N. Avila. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Kalagian, Marc)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jose N. Avila. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (Kalagian, Marc) Modified on 4/2/2021 (MMM).
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. (MMM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Avila v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Marcelo N Illarmo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose N. Avila
Represented By: Marc V Kalagian
Represented By: Gerald Morris Welt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?