Robinson v. Social Security
| Dane S. Robinson |
| Commissioner Of Social Security |
| 2:2021cv00721 |
| May 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dane S. Robinson re #1 Complaint,, #5 Summons Issued as to USA. Commissioner Of Social Security served on 5/17/2021. (Barrett, Mark)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Daniel P. Talbert on behalf of Defendant Commissioner Of Social Security. (Talbert, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #3 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Mark D. Barrett for Dane S. Robinson and approving Designation of Local Counsel Hal Taylor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/4/2021. Any Attorney not yet registered with the Court's CM/ECF System shall submit a Registration Form on the Court's website #www.nvd.uscourts.gov(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Issued as to Commissioner Of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (JQC)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Clerk of Court Regarding Assignment of Social Security Cases. (Document restricted under General Order 2019-08.) (AF)
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (AF)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION/VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice by Mark D. Barrett and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Hal Taylor (Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0978-6470933) by Plaintiff Dane S. Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit CGS PA SpCt) (Taylor, Hal)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Dane S. Robinson. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Taylor, Hal)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0978-6470930) by Dane S. Robinson. Proof of service due by 7/31/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, #2 Summons USAO, #3 Summons USAG, #4 Summons OGC) (Taylor, Hal) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Modified on 5/3/2021 (AF).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Daniel P. Talbert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dane S. Robinson | |
| Represented By: | Hal Taylor |
| Represented By: | Mark D. Barrett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
